Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Committee Assignments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee proposal to expand membership fails after debate over representation and efficiency
Summary
A supervisor-backed resolution to increase standing committee membership—arguing current assignments concentrate representation in Kenosha city limits—failed after committee members split over representation, efficiency and lack of supporting data.
A supervisor introduced a resolution arguing the county should restore larger standing committees so supervisors represent constituents more evenly across Kenosha County. The maker said the county board represents 23 supervisors elected from districts of about 7,500 residents and that current committee assignments concentrated representation inside the Kenosha city limits, leaving about 70,000 residents less represented.
The maker called the change necessary for fairness, saying "it should be fair in fulfilling their position without bias, honesty, and integrity in giving equal representation to all the citizens in each district." Opponents pushed back, saying the county reorganized committees to improve efficiency and that past practice and member availability justified the current structure. One supervisor noted the rules change in 2011 worked well and cautioned against revising policy only months into a term.
Committee members asked for supporting data, including how many resolutions were affected by committee composition, and whether staff or mileage costs would materially change. After discussion the committee took a roll-call vote; the motion failed and the committee returned to its planned agenda.
