Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Flood Resilience topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planner flags FEMA/elevation and pool‑barrier conflicts in comp‑plan review
Summary
The consulting planner urged the board to revisit elevation and seawall policies after state and federal flood regulations and FEMA elevation changes may conflict with local code (including pool‑barrier height differences). He recommended bringing example language back for board review.
Planning staff told the board that several technical issues related to elevation and flood resilience should be reviewed so city code does not conflict with state or federal requirements. The planner noted that FEMA elevation changes and building‑code requirements can create inconsistencies with local rules — for example, the building code may require a 48‑inch barrier for pools while the city code requires a lower barrier.
Dave Dixon recommended the board revisit elevation requirements, seawall guidance and related code language and suggested packaging several changes together for clear commission review. He also noted that legislative changes and pending litigation could affect what local jurisdictions may adopt and that the board should proceed cautiously and seek clear sample language for fences and elevation provisions.
