Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Nuisance Enforcement Next Steps topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee to review model property-maintenance code and consult city code officers as next step on nuisance enforcement
Summary
Committee members and the planning director agreed to review sample ordinances and the model property-maintenance code (chapter 3), consult with Versailles and Midway code boards, and consider an interlocal or joint codes board to close enforcement gaps along urban-service boundaries.
Committee members agreed the next steps on nuisance enforcement should include circulating the model property-maintenance code (chapter 3), reviewing sample county ordinances, and inviting city code officers or codes-board chairs to a working session to discuss joint enforcement options.
Planning Director Steve Hunter recommended bringing city code officials into a working committee and noted many successful cases where codes boards and civil fines produced faster compliance than criminal prosecution. As Hunter put it, codes boards "got that individual in front of the codes board" and the threat of liens and fines led to cleanup in a matter of weeks in one cited example.
Members asked for copies of the property-maintenance code and sample ordinances and suggested the committee evaluate geographic limits (urban-service boundary vs. farm exemptions) and a hardship-review process for residents unable to comply immediately. The county attorney recommended careful drafting to avoid excessive-fines constitutional challenges and suggested tailoring enforcement language to residential subdivisions or contiguous urban areas where appropriate.
The committee did not adopt language at the meeting but directed staff and committee members to continue review and to return with recommended draft language or a plan for an interlocal approach to enforcement.
