Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Homelessness Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Davis County officials outline permanent supportive and transitional housing options for cities
Summary
Davis County staff briefed South Weber council on permanent supportive and transitional housing models, citing a HUD point-in-time count of 127 and local project success rates the county reports near 93%. County staff said no project is proposed for South Weber now but asked cities to consider proposals if site, partners and funding appear.
Davis County staff described two housing approaches the county is studying as tools to reduce homelessness: transitional housing (time-limited stays with program requirements) and permanent supportive housing (indefinite tenancy with on-site case management). Ryan Steinberg, Davis County community services manager, said the county convened a winter-overflow task force after a state law required winter overflow plans and that the legislature later allowed counties flexibility to pursue longer-term solutions instead of seasonal emergency shelters.
Ryan Barber, housing coordinator for Davis County, gave program details and evidence the county uses to justify the approach. Barber cited the HUD point-in-time count and told the council that Davis County recorded 127 people in the most recent published count. He described permanent supportive housing as providing leases plus on-site case management and services and said program data collected in Utah shows high exit-to-stability rates; Barber said some local projects show success rates at about "93 percent." He emphasized the county is not proposing a mandatory project for South Weber and asked only that cities be prepared to "consider hearing" a proposed project if a site, partners and financing become available: "If an opportunity were to arise, and we had the partners, we had the finances, we had everything ready to go, and something like this were to be considered and there was a site of an opportunity here, in South Weber, we would at least consider hearing what the project would be."
Barber and Steinberg outlined partner roles—service providers such as Open Doors, Davis Behavioral Health, the Davis Community Housing Authority and higher-education partners for job training—and said projects can be scaled to community needs (examples cited: 50–60 units in smaller communities). Council members asked whether the county already operates such projects in Davis County and about land constraints; county staff said Davis County is landlocked and is actively searching for feasible sites but is not moving forward on any South Weber project at this time.
