Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel Evaluation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board rejects full evaluation tool, moves to use two sections and schedule review
Summary
Trustees voted down adopting all three parts of the superintendent evaluation tool (2 yes, 4 no) and subsequently moved to adopt only parts 1 and 2, setting dates for evaluation activity and follow-up.
Get email alerts on the Personnel Evaluation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Trustees debated the superintendent evaluation tool and the scope of the review. After discussion, the board voted on approving parts 1–3 as presented; the tally recorded "2 yes, 4 no," and that motion failed. A board member then moved to approve using only parts 1 and 2 of the tool and set a schedule for the evaluation process and subsequent meetings.
Administrator explained parts 1 and 2 focus on student-performance reporting and key performance indicators, which include the state-of-district presentation and measurable goals, while part 3 contains management responsibilities that some trustees considered more subjective. The board agreed to hold evaluation activities in early January and to meet to discuss the evaluation results in mid-January.

