Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Wastewater Capacity topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Presenter warns Lake George system was under‑sized by original engineering, seeks help on design criteria

Lake George Park Commission · September 24, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A presenter told commissioners the local wastewater plant was designed on an annualized average rather than weighted seasonal peaks, citing an earlier consent order and historical summer highs the presenter said reached 60,000–80,000 gallons per day while the plant design used a 14,000 gpd average; the presenter asked the commission for engineering assistance to remedy capacity shortfalls.

A presenter who identified an engineer of record said historical design assumptions left the local wastewater treatment plant undersized for summer demand. The presenter said the original design used a plain annual average and did not apply weighted seasonal averages, producing a planning figure of about 14,000 gallons per day while summer peaks in earlier records showed "60 to 80,000 gallons a day," according to the presenter. He said the design approach dated to 2014 under an earlier consent order and that the mismatch has left the plant short of summer capacity.

The presenter asked the commission for help with engineering criteria and design changes. He described operational consequences—periods when flow dropped to zero on winter days and the plant's inability to accommodate summer load—and warned that higher costs for septage disposal have prompted some noncompliant behavior. "There are some unscrupulous individuals that have been caught, dumping into storm sewers," the presenter said, and he reported roughly four trucks per day at the facility during peak seasons in the past.

Commission discussion acknowledged the plant's technical shortcomings in the transcript and the presenter's request for assistance, but the record does not contain a formal motion or funding decision tied to specific engineering work. The presenter asked for help in revising design criteria rather than immediate operational changes.