Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Rate Study topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Consultant outlines multiyear rate plan, $35M treatment-plant estimate and two funding paths

Montecito Sanitary District Board · March 2, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A rate-study consultant told the Montecito Sanitary District board the district’s capital and operating needs support a 10-year financial plan, including an estimated $35 million wastewater treatment-plant project and options to fund it through steep near-term rate hikes or a combination of rates plus debt.

The district’s rate-study consultant presented a multiyear financial model March 2 that projects the district’s capital, operating and reserve needs over the next decade and shows how different funding strategies would affect rates and reserves.

Consultant modeling estimated the wastewater treatment-plant project at approximately $35,000,000 and placed total planned capital spending in the multi‑year rebuilding and rehabilitation plan in the tens of millions. The consultant illustrated a rates-only scenario — which would require very large near-term rate increases — and a blended approach that issues debt in fiscal year 2029 to spread costs over 30 years.

"We assumed the $42,000,000 30 year, debt issuance at 5% over a 30 year period," the consultant said when describing the favored model. Under the recommended blended approach, the consultant presented phased revenue increases of 14% in FY27 and FY28, then 13%, 12% and 10% in subsequent years to meet capital and reserve goals while maintaining industry-standard debt-service coverage levels.

The consultant emphasized that the Proposition 218 process requires a detailed cost-of-service report and a 45-day notice before a hearing; written protests meeting the statutory threshold can prevent rates from being adopted. The board asked for additional detail on the proposed schedule, the treatment-plant timing and alternative scenarios that would soften the initial-year hit to ratepayers.

Next steps: staff will finalize the cost-of-service report, produce a draft Proposition 218 notice and bring comparisons for alternative rate paths and reserve targets back to the board.