Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Climate Resiliency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cheney commissioners debate softened language in proposed Climate Resiliency element
Summary
Spokane County staff and Cascadia Consulting presented a new Climate Resiliency Element for Cheney's 2026 Comprehensive Plan. Commissioners pushed for 'softer' policy wording to avoid implying mandatory requirements and asked staff for grant and siting details.
Cheney Planning Commission members spent the bulk of their March 9 meeting reviewing a proposed Climate Resiliency Element for the 2026 Comprehensive Plan presented by Spokane County and Cascadia Consulting.
Graham Zickefoose, representing Spokane County, introduced the element and consultant Katherine Allison of Cascadia Consulting summarized updates. "The Element added train emission topics and a focus on wetlands along with softer language and the removal of lower priority policies as requested by Mr. Mourning," Allison said, noting recent revisions since the November meeting.
Commissioners repeatedly questioned where the line should be drawn between mandates and aspirational policies. Commissioner Rick Mount said the term "required" carries a specific meaning and expressed concern that removing action words could change legal expectations. Staff member Terry Mourning said he requested softer language to distinguish between items required by state law and those the City desires but does not have a legal obligation to implement.
No final action was taken; staff said they would provide additional supporting data, including a list of potential grants, and return with clarifications at a future meeting.
