Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Bike Parking topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission weighs bike‑parking and TOD waiver for Oakwood project
Summary
Commissioners and staff debated whether to allow an exception to transit‑oriented frontage rules and to reduce required bike parking from the code's 107 stalls to the 30 proposed by Oakwood. Commissioners urged applicant flexibility for future e‑bike use.
Get email alerts on the Bike Parking topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A key part of the Oakwood Village University Woods review centered on a requested waiver from Transit‑Oriented Development (TOD) frontage rules and a substantial reduction in required bicycle parking.
Planning staff explained the Zoning Code calculation and how it yields 107 required bike stalls for the 92‑unit building; the applicant proposed 30 stalls. "In this case, that would be a total of 107 bike parking stalls based on the number of dwelling units," said Tim Parks, planning staff, citing the code and pointing commissioners to condition 46 in the staff report.
Oakwood's leadership said current resident behavior drove the waiver request. "We have about 5 to 7% of our resident population, [who] use bikes," said Keith Van Landet, explaining the campus provides bike racks and volunteer transport options and that the waiver was requested to reflect realistic resident needs.
Commissioner Heck urged the applicant to consider e‑bikes and additional interior bike parking: "I would just express the hope that you can continue to encourage use of e‑bikes by your residents because I think there's some potential there," she said. Commissioner Wazniewski said he was "struggling" with deviations from the TOD plan and warned that approving exceptions could discount future residents who might bike.
Staff advised commissioners that any approval should point to the site's unique circumstances — existing campus pattern, 1973 planned development history and topography — to avoid creating a broad precedent for other sites. The commission approved the project with the waiver but asked the applicant to remain flexible on internal bike parking and to provide clearer detail in final conditions.

