Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Relocation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Aspen commissioners split on lifting house to add basement; one side questions destroying historic foundation
Summary
Commissioners disagreed over relocation-in-place to create a basement at 212 North Monarch: some said lifting in place and veneering the old foundation is an accepted preservation outcome, while others said removing a functioning historic foundation contradicts preservation guidelines.
Commissioners split in a lengthy discussion over whether the projects plan to lift the historic resource in place and excavate a basement meets the commissions preservation mandate. Several commissioners said the relocation criteria have been met for an in-place lift and that heavy-duty shoring and an engineers report would mitigate risk.
Others disagreed. One commissioner noted that previous approvals for basements typically accompanied documented foundation failure and asked why this foundation, which staff said showed no clear signs of failing, should be removed. Commissioners asked that if the team proceeds with excavation the applicant provide a shoring and relocation plan, a structural-engineer report, and photographic monitoring. The commission also discussed precedent: staff and some members said using historic stone as a veneer has been permitted in prior cases, while opponents said structural replacement of intact fabric is a high bar that demands strong justification.
