Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Parks And Open Space topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

HOA member warns Track L transfer would breach homeowners' expectations and privacy

Estacada City Council · August 11, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Amanda Shepherd, speaking for Cascadia Ridge No. 6 HOA, urged council to decline opening Track L to public access, citing a conservation easement that she says requires a 75% homeowner super‑majority and developer approval to remove, plus concerns about after‑hours security and parking impacts.

Amanda Shepherd, introduced to the council as a representative of the Cascadia Ridge No. 6 Homeowners Association, told the council the HOA opposes the proposed transfer of ‘‘Track L’’ to public access because it would change the character of properties adjacent to the tract and threaten homeowner privacy. She said the track ‘‘borders our backyards’’ and that many neighbors bought their homes because the tract was a protected natural buffer.

Shepherd told the council that the HOA governing documents describe the tract as protected and that ‘‘removing [the conservation easement] would require a super majority vote of all homeowners as well as a written approval from Richmond American, the original developer.’’ She said the HOA does not expect those thresholds to be met at this time and that the community plans to pursue volunteer maintenance and a neighborhood subcommittee to address liability concerns.

Council members asked clarifying questions about whether the HOA board had authority to negotiate with the city and whether that board represented a majority of homeowners; Shepherd said the governing documents might conflict with Oregon law and noted that, under state statutes, many boards cannot transfer commonly held property without an approximately 75% super‑majority.

The council did not take immediate action on the item during the public comment period; staff indicated the consent agenda could decline acceptance of the tract for the time being so issues can be resolved. Shepherd said the HOA will continue to communicate with city staff and may return with further materials.

Provenance: topicintro SEG 033, topfinish SEG 119

Speakers (attribution whitelist): [{"name":"Amanda Shepherd","role_title":"Cascadia Ridge No. 6 HOA member","affiliation_type":"citizen","affiliation_name":"Cascadia Ridge No. 6 HOA","first_reference":{"block_id_start":"SEG 037"}}]

Proper_names: [{"name":"Richmond American","type":"organization"},{"name":"Cascadia Ridge","type":"location"},{"name":"Track L","type":"location"}],

Topics: [{"name":"parks_and_open_space","justification":"Public comment focused on proposed transfer of a conserved tract ('Track L') and potential park access impacts.","scoring":{"topic_relevance":0.90,"depth_score":0.65,"opinionatedness":0.10,"controversy":0.40,"civic_salience":0.50,"impactfulness":0.45,"geo_relevance":1.00}}]