Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners debate offering 2 acres at CCEC for new animal shelter; split on using prime interchange land
Summary
Commissioner Bennington proposed giving two acres of the CCEC site for a new animal shelter; commissioners debated whether the county should use prime interstate‑adjacent land for a shelter versus revenue-generating uses (hotel/event center), and discussed acreage and parking needs for an event center. No final decision was made.
Commissioner Bennington proposed giving two acres of the CCEC site to the county animal shelter and said a rendering (not to exceed $5,000) could support planning. He argued a county location would improve access and make the shelter more visible and usable by residents.
"I will make the motion that we give you 2 acres of the CCEC site," Bennington said during the work session. Other commissioners pushed back, raising the opportunity cost of using interstate‑adjacent, potentially revenue‑generating land for a non‑revenue service: "The opportunity cost of putting an animal shelter there when, hopefully, we could put a hotel there that would be revenue generating..." one commissioner said. Commissioners also debated whether the CCEC back triangle has adequate acreage and parking for a large event center; several planning experts who had been consulted said a minimum of about 25 acres is needed for a full event/convention center.
Why it matters: the decision pits a community service need (a dilapidated animal shelter facility) against long‑term land‑use and revenue considerations for county economic development. Commissioners discussed alternatives — building on other county land, partnering with nonprofit humane societies, or using donated funds — and did not vote during the work session. Bennington said he will present a formal motion during the regular meeting.
