Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Streets And Sidewalks topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Bandera council trims REDGRANT sidewalk plans, opts to prioritize lighting to meet deadlines

Bandera City Council · May 14, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council and grant consultants agreed to remove a proposed Cedar-to-11th sidewalk from the TDA/RED grant scope to protect parking and meet deadlines, instead prioritizing additional lighting along Main Street and adjacent stretches; adding sidewalk scope would have required extra surveying and added an estimated $5,000—$10,000 in local costs and could delay the project.

City grant staff and consultants briefed the council on possible scope changes to the city's TDA/RED grant project, including new sidewalks on the historic block, a middle-school connection (deemed ineligible for this economic-development grant), crosswalk flashers and additional lighting.

The consultants said adding a Cedar-to-11th sidewalk would require additional survey and geotechnical work and could require $5,000 to $10,000 in local matching funds and would likely delay the project submission and construction timeline. Staff recommended prioritizing lighting adjacent to the already-approved sidewalk scope rather than expanding the sidewalk footprint in places where adding sidewalk would remove scarce parking. "If we do add additional scope to the project, that would require additional survey and geotech to be included," a consultant said; the consultant estimated an additional $5,000—$10,000 for that work.

Council and staff agreed to remove the extra Cedar Street parking-lot sidewalk from the grant amendment and to pursue additional lighting that fits the current environmental clearance area and timelines. Staff warned that a material amendment could risk points under the TDA midpoint review and could require community comment or a council resolution if it were not a minor change.

The council recorded support for moving forward with lighting and asked staff to proceed with an amendment request focused on lighting while avoiding scope changes that would jeopardize the grant schedule.