Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Suppression Motion topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Court denies motion to suppress in Guzman case; matter set for disposition
Summary
The judge denied a motion to suppress in State v. Victor Guzman after hearing evidence and argument the previous day, and the court set the case for disposition on Monday with options for paperwork to be completed sooner.
The judge said the court had already heard evidence and argument on the motion to suppress and asked whether either side wished to present further argument. "No," came the response from counsel, and the judge said, "So, the motion to suppress is denied." The court then set the matter for disposition on Monday and discussed whether the state could prepare paperwork electronically if the parties preferred to avoid personal appearances.
The judge explained that the court had reviewed evidence presented the prior day and would not reopen argument because no party requested it. The court invited the parties to request an earlier setting if they wished to proceed sooner, and staff agreed to coordinate any paperwork to facilitate a plea or disposition outside of a weekday appearance.
