Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Kempsville Rezoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council defers vote on 251‑unit Kempsville Road rezoning after neighborhood concerns; 30‑day review ordered
Summary
Council deferred a decision on a Bonaventure/DH Farmhouse LLC rezoning request for 1805 Kempsville Road — a proposed two‑building, 251‑unit development — and asked staff and the applicant to address pedestrian safety (possible HAWK signal), stormwater, and school‑capacity questions during a 30‑day period.
After substantial neighborhood testimony and civic‑league advocacy, the City Council voted to defer action for 30 days on a conditional rezoning application at 1805 Kempsville Road that would allow two four‑story buildings and 251 apartments. Residents and civic‑league leaders urged additional study of pedestrian safety across Kempsville Road (including the potential cost and timing of a HAWK pedestrian signal), stormwater impacts, and school capacity and staffing.
The Planning Commission had recommended approval by an 11‑0 vote; the applicant’s counsel noted the project proffers an 11‑foot side path along the frontage and a $100,000 contribution intended for pedestrian signalization. Residents and civic‑league speakers, including Samantha Roquin of the Charlestown Area Civic League, said the $100,000 contribution is unlikely to cover the actual cost of a HAWK signal and asked the council to require clearer financial responsibility for pedestrian and traffic mitigation. Roquin said the community’s concern is the development itself, not developer motives: “What we're here for is the development itself, not the developers,” she said, describing traffic, flooding, and school impacts.
Councilmembers debated whether the proffers and technical reviews that follow a rezoning motion would be sufficient and whether a short pause would produce better outcomes. A substitute motion to defer for 30 days carried; during the deferral council and staff will follow up with the applicant on pedestrian mitigation scope and funding, clarify stormwater design expectations for the site plan process, and document school‑system capacity analyses so neighborhood questions can be addressed before any final rezoning vote.
What happens next: the applicant retains the right to refine design and proffers; the city will require the standard traffic, stormwater, and environmental studies as part of the site‑plan and rezoning process. The deferment does not approve or deny the rezoning; it preserves the opportunity for additional neighborhood engagement and technical review.
