Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Water Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission adopts water‑use and preservation element amid debate over climate language and science citations
Summary
Planning director said county water use is already below the state's 2030 target; the commission adopted the water‑use and preservation chapter 6–1 after public comments urging stronger climate references and a request for explicit citations and a climate‑data subcommittee.
Andrew Jackson, Grand County planner, presented the water‑use and preservation element and said the text references the Moab Spanish Valley water utility management plan. "Our water users have already cut their per‑capita use. In fact, it's lower than what the state is recommending for 2030," Jackson said, and he urged the commission to adopt the element with added graphs showing demand‑reduction scenarios.
Public commenters — including representatives of water providers and residents — asked for stronger, explicit references to climate change, hydrologic uncertainty, and citations to the studies they had submitted. Commissioner Hadeem and others pressed for a subcommittee to assemble climate‑informed water data and to include explicit references in the general‑plan text. Planning staff and several commissioners countered that the element intentionally references and aligns with an existing $500,000 water‑utility plan and that detailed technical analyses are located in that specialized document.
After discussion the commission voted to adopt the water‑use and preservation element with the graphs as presented, 6–1 (Commissioner Hadeem opposed). Jackson said ordinances that would implement policies in the chapter would come later and require separate hearings.
