Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board debates whether workshops should be 'regular meetings' and how to handle public comment
Summary
Trustees spent extensive time debating proposed edits to meeting-conduct language: whether to remove workshop-specific wording to match WASDA model policy, whether to record all meetings as required by recent law, and how and when the board may respond to public comment.
A lengthy portion of the workshop (more than an hour of discussion) covered policy 1400 on meeting conduct, order of business and quorum. Chair (S1) and multiple trustees debated removing workshop-specific language and adopting WASDA model wording that treats both scheduled gatherings as regular meetings. Board member (S7) said she wanted to know which deletions were required by WASDA/model policy and which were internal edits, urging staff to show the provenance of each change.
Trustees also discussed public-comment protocol. Chair (S1) emphasized the board27s legal constraint under OPMA against engaging in off-agenda discussions: "the board is not obligated to respond to questions or challenges made during public comments period," and several members suggested bringing in a WASDA or legal trainer (e.g., Sean McPherson) to brief the board. Members proposed either explicitly preserving workshop expectations (that action is not typical) or keeping model language but adding clarifying guidance for the public and board practice.
