Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Short Term Rentals topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Citrus County commissioners keep short‑term rental ordinance on agenda, ask staff for more work

Citrus County Board of County Commissioners · August 11, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After a public hearing on a draft short‑term vacation rental ordinance (Chapter 79), commissioners agreed the draft needs more work — particularly occupancy limits, noise standards, parking/boat anchoring rules, and legal safeguards — and directed staff to refine the proposal and consult other counties.

The Citrus County Board of County Commissioners held an advertised public hearing Aug. 11 to consider a proposed ordinance regulating short‑term vacation rentals (Chapter 79). Dozens of residents, property managers and real estate professionals testified for and against aspects of the draft.

Property manager Vicki Tashton told the board she supports regulation but urged adding noise ordinance decibel standards and limiting occupancy. "You had nothing about noise ordinance and decibels. You had nothing about the timeframe that is quiet time," she said. Local real‑estate broker Rob Tessmer Jr. opposed broad registry and enforcement costs and warned about legal risks other Florida counties have faced when ordinances overreach; "Adding a costly annual registry layer won't stop a late night disturbance — enforcing the existing laws will," he told the board.

County staff briefed commissioners on software used to identify listings and on counts of current rentals: the software showed 629 active rentals and about 1,800 listings across platforms. County administrators noted the ordinance also aims to improve local tax collection from short‑term rental activity.

Commissioners broadly agreed the draft ordinance requires refinement. Areas flagged for revision included a very low 150 square‑foot per occupant metric (several commissioners described that number as “obscenely low”), clearer maximum‑occupancy rules tied to bedroom counts or plumbing capacity, variance/grandfathering for pre‑existing homes, explicit noise/decibel standards and sensible rules for boat trailers and parking. Commissioners asked staff to study approaches other counties use and to return with options and legal review to reduce risk of successful challenges. The board did not vote on final language; the ordinance will be revised and returned for further consideration.