Citizen Portal

Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Residents split over data-center ban as council debates notice and studies

Berkeley Heights Township Council · August 12, 2026

Summary

During the public hearing on multiple ordinances, dozens of residents debated a proposed townwide ban on data centers. Speakers raised grid, environmental, economic and procedural concerns; some urged tabling, others urged immediate protection.

At a packed public hearing the township heard sustained comment both supporting and opposing a proposed ordinance that would ban data centers across Berkeley Heights.

Adam Horowitz, a resident who spoke at the podium, framed the technical concern: "PJM ... announced that they were 6.8 gigawatts short of the reliability target," he said, arguing such demand could worsen local outages. Several residents urged caution and asked the council to publish comparable impact analyses—contrasting the possible effects of data centers against housing developments already approved at the Nokia/600 Mountain Avenue site.

Other commenters urged a precautionary approach, noting that a townwide ban can be amended later. One resident raised procedural questions about notice to property owners and warned the council could face legal challenges if notice requirements or timing did not meet statutory standards; the township attorney responded that the local timeline here (about 43 days since introduction) exceeded the timing in a cited out-of-town case. The council repeatedly described the ordinance as a change to permitted land uses that will require any developer wanting a data center to make a specific, public case for it.

The hearing closed with members of the public urging the council to either table the ordinance until more study is shared or to adopt it to protect residents; the council ultimately adopted the ordinance later in the meeting.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source