Disparity study finds gaps for MWBE firms; county staff propose supplier‑diversity program

Procurement staff presented a disparity study to the board showing that, during the FY22–FY24 study period, the county analyzed approximately $722 million in expenditures and found that MWBE (minority‑ and women‑owned business) utilization was about 17.25% compared with an estimated availability of 24% in the relevant marketplace. Vernetta Mitchell of consulting firm MGT told supervisors that the overall analysis shows statistically significant disparities in utilization for most groups except Asian‑American owned firms.

The study combined quantitative spend data, availability estimates and qualitative surveys and focus groups. It identified barriers vendors reported — limited communication and feedback on bids, difficulties navigating procurement requirements, prime‑contractor behavior that discourages partnerships, and limited access to capital. MGT recommended better subcontractor data collection, establishing a business inclusion or strategic supplier‑diversity program (including race‑ and gender‑based paths where lawful and race‑neutral paths for veterans and small businesses), aspirational goals, a procurement forecast and a 5–7 year program sunset and reevaluation.

Procurement Director Shana Terry told the board staff will use the study to design a strategic supplier‑diversity program consistent with Virginia law and to improve transparency (public procurement forecasts and outreach). Staff estimated about a six‑month timeline to design an initial program and committed to return to the board before requesting new ongoing funding or full staffing for the program.

"This is a marketplace analysis," consultant Vernetta Mitchell said, summarizing the three‑pronged methodology of quantitative, availability and qualitative analysis. The board signaled majority support for staff to design a program and asked the county executive and procurement to return with a scope and any budget requests for the FY27 cycle.

The presentation included specifics on utilization by group and industry, recommended data‑collection improvements and proposed aspirational goals that would be evaluated at the program sunset review.