Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Construction Excise Tax topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
North Marion board weighs raising construction excise tax to shore up capital fund
Summary
Board members were presented options to keep the district's construction excise tax at the current $1.00 (residential)/$0.50 (commercial), discontinue it, or adopt the state-indexed rates (up to $1.70 residential/$0.85 commercial). Staff said indexed rates would better track inflation but urged public outreach and a phased approach.
Board members on North Marion School District's board heard a detailed presentation on the district's construction excise tax and whether to adjust the district's long-standing static rates.
Staff explained the tax's purpose and limits, noting it "only applies to increased square footage" and that proceeds are restricted to capital improvements and equipment. Kim summarized historical receipts: "in this 11 year span, we have collected just over $1,000,000 at the rates that were established back in 2012." She said the district currently charges $1.00 per additional residential square foot and $0.50 per square foot for commercial construction, while the Department of Revenue's indexed maximums now permit up to $1.70 and $0.85 respectively.
Board members asked practical questions about who pays the tax and whether higher rates would deter development. Kim confirmed the permit holder ultimately pays the charge and estimated the district's receipts are roughly 85% residential and 15% commercial, saying that residential predominance affects the financial impact of any rate change.
Staff presented illustrative modeling showing that, had the district adopted indexed rates earlier, "that fund would have about an additional $370,000 in it," but cautioned that past collections are not a guarantee of future receipts because the tax is activity-driven. Members asked for additional information, including comparisons with neighboring districts, a five-year sliding (phase-in) approach, a prioritized list of imminent capital needs from the facility assessment, and public outreach before any final decision.
Staff recommended taking the matter up again after gathering those details; one possible effective date discussed for a resolution was Sept. 1, 2026, but staff emphasized that the board can choose any timing and structure, including separate treatment of residential and commercial rates.
