Citizen Portal

Get email alerts on the Surveillance Privacy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Resident urges ballot question to decide Rangely'9s Flock license-plate reader system

Rangely Town Council · November 12, 2025

Summary

At a Rangely Town Council meeting, resident Mark Stamos urged the council to place the town'9s Flock license-plate reader system on the next local ballot, saying voters should decide whether to keep the surveillance cameras. Council members agreed to consult the town attorney before taking further steps.

Mark Stamos told the Rangely Town Council he opposes the town'9s Flock license-plate reader system and asked that the question be placed on the next local ballot so residents can decide.

"I'9d like to propose that it be placed on the ballot asking whether the public would like to keep this flock system in place," Stamos said, arguing that a ballot question would show whether the town wants the cameras retained. He told council members he is worried about long-term privacy implications and the possibility that movement data stored in the cloud could be accessed by bad actors.

Council members responded that the issue raises legal and procedural questions that warrant review. One council member said the best next step is to "talk to our town attorney and get her recommendation on it," and the council indicated it will follow up with legal counsel before deciding whether the town can place the item on a local ballot.

The commenter noted he believes the town'9s previous budget packet and a police report referenced the system and a $9,000 payment, and asked that officials clarify when residents were first notified. Council members acknowledged the concern and said they would look into the notification history and legal options.

No council action was taken at the meeting; members said they will consult the town attorney and report back at a later date.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source