Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Staff Handbook topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Perrydale board approves streamlined staff handbook

Perrydale School District 21 Board · August 11, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Perrydale School District 21 board voted to approve a revised staff handbook that shortens language and clarifies meeting schedules; the board agreed attorney review will occur only as needed for policy items.

The Perrydale School District 21 board voted to approve an updated staff handbook after a presentation and brief discussion.

Staff member (speaker 2) told the board that “really, the focus has been for the staff handbook just shortening the language,” emphasizing the changes are editorial and intended to clarify existing expectations rather than introduce new policy. The revision highlights a schedule of staff meetings (page 30) intended to make planning easier: whole‑staff meetings are expected to occur on the third Wednesday to coordinate across buildings and address student needs.

Board members asked whether the handbook will receive routine legal review. Staff member said the book will not be sent to the attorney every year, but items that function as formal policy will be reviewed when questions arise. The board discussed consistency around enforcement language (for example, how staff apply discipline and cell‑phone rules) and confirmed that policy‑linked language such as fundraising will retain alignment with existing district policy.

A board member moved to approve the staff handbook; the motion was seconded and passed by voice vote.

Board members said they preferred either seeing changes as strikeouts or having the old book available for comparison; staff agreed to provide formats that help trustees compare prior language. The board did not specify any immediate follow‑up actions beyond routine implementation and occasional legal review.