Citizen Portal

Get email alerts on the Personnel topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Memphis I.S.D. board approves superintendent evaluation and extends contract through 2026-27

Memphis Independent School District Board of Trustees · February 21, 2025

Summary

After a closed session under Tex. Govt. Code 551.074, the Memphis I.S.D. Board of Trustees approved the superintendent's evaluation, contract and compensation and extended the superintendent's contract through the 2026-27 school year by a 5-0 vote.

The Memphis Independent School District Board of Trustees voted unanimously Jan. 23, 2025, to approve the superintendent's evaluation, contract and compensation and to extend the superintendent's contract from the 2024-25 term through 2026-27. Trustee Josh Brooks made the motion to approve the evaluation and contract; Trustee Joey Salinas seconded. The motion passed with a recorded vote of 5-0.

The board entered closed session at 7:28 p.m., citing "Personal Tex. Govt Code 551.074," and returned to open session at 8:39 p.m., where the action was taken. The five trustees recorded present for the vote were Sarah Cook, John Robison, Josh Brooks, Charolette Maddox and Joey Salinas; two trustees (Michael Morris and Val Gonzalez) were noted as not present earlier in the meeting. The minutes record the contract extension without listing further contract terms or compensation figures.

The action follows the superintendent evaluation presented earlier in the meeting; the minutes do not specify additional performance findings or the compensation amounts approved. The board set its next public meeting for Feb. 20, 2025, at 6:00 p.m. and adjourned at 8:44 p.m.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source