Get email alerts on the Missing Middle Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission considers 'permitted limited' category to streamline ADUs, duplexes and conversions
Summary
Staff proposed a new 'permitted limited' use standard for CD‑3 to allow accessory dwelling units and duplexes by right when objective standards are met, reduce ADU minimums to 200 sq ft, define ADU caps (1,000 sq ft or 40% of primary dwelling), and set conversion rules for multiple‑family dwellings.
Get email alerts on the Missing Middle Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Packet 2 of the planning department’s zoning text changes would create a new 'permitted subject to limited use standards' category in CD‑3 to streamline approval of accessory dwelling units (ADUs), duplexes and some multiple‑family conversions. Staff explained the change follows best practices recommending that non‑discretionary, objective standards be approved administratively when compliance can be checked with black‑and‑white criteria.
Key proposed changes include reducing the minimum ADU size from 400 square feet to 200 square feet to allow realistic conversions of small detached garages and increase ADU feasibility, capping ADUs at the lesser of 1,000 square feet or 40% of the principal dwelling, removing a problematic 40‑sq‑ft per occupant rule that conflicted with building code standards, and clarifying the distinction between ADUs and duplexes so ADUs remain smaller accessory units while duplexes are two similarly sized principal units.
For multiple‑family dwellings, staff proposed that conversions meet the same objective criteria used for new dwellings, but that new multiple‑family buildings remain subject to special‑use permit review unless the commission decides to permit them by right. Commissioners debated whether to retain discretionary review for new multiple‑family buildings or move to a fully permitted approach; staff said the primary reason for keeping some SUP review was to preserve discretionary oversight in cases with concerns like large parking lots in the middle of neighborhoods.
Commissioners discussed parking requirements for new multiple‑family units in CD‑3 and whether conversion standards should remain discretionary; staff offered that stricter, black‑and‑white standards would support moving conversions to permitted review while retaining SUP for large new buildings if commissioners prefer.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

