Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance Policy 011 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board member proposes merging Danielson examples into governance policy; committee agrees to continue discussion
Summary
Board member Ms. Jalal proposed supplementing Policy 011 with examples drawn from the Danielson framework to clarify expectations and model a culture of inquiry; committee members debated whether governance policy or a separate vehicle is the correct place for such language and agreed to continue work in September.
Board member Ms. Jalal urged the policy committee to consider blending the PSBA norms used in Policy 011 with the Danielson framework so the board’s governance policy includes concrete examples that translate board expectations into the classroom. "By simply posting a photo of the workspace exactly as it was expected to look when they left, a source of friction was transformed into a clear standard that everyone could visualize and follow with joy," she said, using a classroom analogy to illustrate why specificity matters.
Several committee members said they appreciated the aim of clearer expectations but questioned whether Policy 011 — a governance document — is the right place to import language commonly used for teacher evaluation. Ms. Plank suggested keeping Policy 011 focused on governance norms and instead amending it with clarifying language rather than swapping it entirely. The chair summarized options — keep the policy, amend sections, substitute Ms. Jalal’s proposal wholesale, or craft a hybrid — and asked members to review both drafts so the committee can resume deliberations in September.
Members emphasized two consistent goals: codifying mutual respect and making clear that board inquiry is legitimate and not evidence of distrust of administration. The committee did not take formal action to change Policy 011 tonight; it agreed to continue the conversation at the September policy committee meeting.
