Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Facility Project topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board reviews athletic-complex survey; concept estimate $4–5 million, district may use capital allocation certificates

Colman-Egan School District 50-5 Board of Education · September 12, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board reviewed an ISG concept drawing and survey for a proposed athletic complex; the concept lists an estimated $4–5 million cost and potential use of up to $3.5 million in capital allocation certificates plus donations and in‑kind contributions.

Board members reviewed a concept and survey for an athletic complex presented as a draft by ISG. Superintendent Scott described the concept as a starting point and said the project estimate was between $4 million and $5 million; the packet said the district could utilize up to $3.5 million in capital allocation certificates and would seek donations and in‑kind contributions to supplement the allocation.

Members discussed labeling the drawing "concept" on materials to avoid implying a final design, and reviewed outreach plans (mailing the survey, a QR code and school website notice). The packet proposed a response window with materials sent Sept. 22 and responses due by Oct. 9 to align with the board's next meeting. Board members debated what level of community support would justify moving forward — one member said they would look for support higher than a simple majority and mentioned 60% as a personal threshold — and staff noted statutory limits and valuation rules around use of capital allocation certificates.

Superintendent Scott said the $4–5 million figure came from comparable projects and was meant to provide a starting point for community feedback rather than a fixed contract price. The board agreed to send the survey with minor edits (labeling the drawing as conceptual) and to review results at the following meeting.