Get email alerts on the Community Feedback topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Project applicant objects to rubber cushions, urges paved speed tables instead
Summary
The project applicant (Trevor) said he 'is not in favor of this type of speed cushion' and favors paved speed tables like those on Chickering Lane; NDOT staff replied that the program typically deploys removable rubber cushions for cost and procurement reasons and offered to follow up.
Trevor (the applicant) expressed opposition to the proposed rubber speed cushions and said he preferred paved cushions or speed tables used elsewhere in the city.
As read aloud by Chase Fuqua, Trevor said, "I'm not in favor of this type of speed cushion. Pave speed cushions and tables like the ones on Chickering Lane are much better." Fuqua responded that the program traditionally uses rubber cushions that are durable but removable and that paved devices are likely more expensive and not the program's standard procurement approach.
Fuqua acknowledged resident aesthetic concerns and offered to relay feedback to Metro staff and follow up with Trevor offline to explore options, but he emphasized the program's aim for consistent, quickly deployable devices countywide.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
