Citizen Portal

Get email alerts on the Land Use topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Public turns out in force over proposed UDO changes on chickens and data centers

Newton County Board of Commissioners · July 9, 2026

Summary

Hundreds of residents spoke during public comment over proposed UDO changes that could limit backyard chickens and address data‑center zoning; speakers warned about food security, senior incomes and notification practices while urging the county to preserve farming practices and improve transparency.

A lengthy public comment period drew dozens of speakers and at least one resident‑led petition exceeding 500 signatures opposing proposed UDO changes that residents said would limit backyard chickens and roosters and constrain traditional land stewardship.

Multiple speakers described relying on small flocks for food or supplemental income, urged the board not to remove the ability to keep chickens on larger lots and asked for solutions that protect both neighbors in small‑lot subdivisions and farmers on larger tracts. "We don't want Alpharetta. We don't want Peachtree City," said Dave Norton, urging a UDO tailored to Newton County's rural character.

Other speakers raised concerns about proposed data‑center zoning and its water and electric impacts. Several residents asked for greater transparency in planning and zoning outreach — including putting commissioner packets and planning‑and‑zoning items online — and suggested an ethics board and more robust notification for community meetings.

Commissioners repeatedly emphasized the UDO review is a countywide process, not an immediate change to ordinances, and encouraged residents to engage in upcoming ordinance review sessions before any final decisions are made.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source