Get email alerts on the Rural Land Assessment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board adjusts values and classifications across six parcels in multi-PID appeal
Summary
The Board reviewed multiple parcels for Horst A. A. and Teresa Coffman / Michael Cook and recorded a mix of outcomes: one parcel unchanged; several building values reduced (including one set to $0); land values reduced; and one homesite reclassified to residual pending Real Estate Office approval.
Get email alerts on the Rural Land Assessment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At 3:15 p.m. on June 25, 2026, Michael appeared in person for the multi-parcel appeal involving PIDs 25373, 25374, 24743, 15291, 15299 and 3476. The minutes record distinct issues per parcel: PID 25373 sits in a floodplain and is used for haying — the board made no change; PID 25374’s dwelling lacked a well and heat and had no drywall or plaster, prompting a reduction in building value to $76,400 (overall value $247,970); PID 24743’s structure was deemed unsafe and likely to be torn down and its building value was set to $0 (overall $35,098); PID 15291 was considered undevelopable and its land/overall value reduced to $191,400; PID 15299 contains an easement used to access PID 15291 and the homesite was changed to residual pending approval from Becky in the Real Estate Office (new overall $5,800); and PID 3476’s rough terrain and limited access led to a reduced land value of $18,200.
The board’s motions (multiple motions recorded, moved and seconded across parcels) carried with unanimous agreement according to the minutes; the record lists the resulting assessed values for each PID and notes the approval to change the homesite classification for PID 15299 pending Real Estate Office confirmation.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
