Get email alerts on the Student Health Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board awards nursing-services contract to Legacy after competitive RFP
Summary
After reviewing four proposals for district nursing services, the evaluation team recommended Legacy (a local provider) for reliability and continuity. The board voted to award Legacy a contract for the 2025–26 school year.
Get email alerts on the Student Health Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Brandon Larson (S2), director of special services, presented results of the district’s nursing-services RFP and explained that four proposals were received — Legacy (a longstanding local partner) and three staffing agencies. He said the evaluation panel (including district administrators and board representation) weighted performance against the RFP’s performance requirements and found Legacy’s proposal best met the district’s need for consistent, on-call coverage.
Brandon told the board, "I think we agreed that continuing with Legacy for our nursing services is the best option for us at this time." He and other staff emphasized the value of stable, familiar nurses who build relationships with students and families rather than an unpredictable pool-based on-call model offered by some vendors. Discussion included requests from board members to see scoring detail; staff said legal counsel previously recommended posting anonymous scores for RFPs, and that more detailed scoring may be made available to board members on request.
A motion to award the contract to Legacy (recommended provider) for the 2025–26 school year was moved, seconded and approved on a voice vote. Staff said the Legacy bid was within the district budget assumptions; staff will finalize contract documents and report back on implementation.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

