Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Charter Funding topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Seaside board reviews Cannon Beach Academy charter, funding and contract timeline

Seaside School District Board (Work Session) · May 20, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Seaside School District staff reviewed Cannon Beach Academy’s charter history and current funding arrangement—district-paid 80% of per-pupil state funding—reporting a fiscal-year payment of $332,348.07 and noting the charter agreement runs through June 30, 2028. Board members asked for follow-up on any request to raise the allocation to 90%.

Seaside School District staff reviewed Cannon Beach Academy’s charter relationship and current payments during a work session, confirming the district currently pays the academy 80% of the calculated per-pupil amount under the existing charter agreement. Mary Ellen, identified by academy presenters as the school’s director, told the board: "Cannon Beach Academy is a charter school that is sponsored specifically by Seaside School District."

Staff noted the academy’s current charter runs from 2023 and expires June 30, 2028, and provided a fiscal-year payment total to the academy of "$332,348.07." Board members pressed for clarity about what the 80/20 split means in practice; district staff said payments are calculated via the state funding formula (average enrollment weight times the state rate) and the district pays its 80% share out of district funds rather than receiving an offsetting 20% from the state.

Academy representatives have requested consideration of a higher allocation (discussed informally as moving toward 90%). Several board members described that increase as a difficult ask given district budget constraints and said the request would require follow-up analysis. The board did not vote; members asked staff to return with budget implications and comparative figures at a subsequent meeting.