Citizen Portal

Get email alerts on the Development Agreement Amasa topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council approves phase 1 development agreement for Amasa project; Miles recuses

Moab City Council · February 25, 2026

Summary

Council approved a phase 1 development agreement for the Amasa (57 West King Creek) project, which preserves prior omnibus concessions and includes phase-specific affordability commitments recorded in the transcript; Miles recused and the motion passed 3-0.

The Moab City Council voted to approve a phase 1 development agreement for the Amasa project at 57 West King Creek, advancing a multi-phase redevelopment that staff described as extracting individual phase agreements from an earlier omnibus DA. Joanna told the council the omnibus DA originally allowed subsequent DAs for phases 2 and 3 and that the phase 1 agreement retains earlier concessions while designating specific benefits for this phase. According to staff remarks in the meeting transcript, "the benefits specific to this phase are 50 units of, 50% AMI to 25% AMI." Miles recused from the discussion before the vote; the motion passed with a recorded tally of 3-0.

Council members raised questions about parking for later phases, noting that negotiated concessions would reduce required stalls. Applicant representative Amanda explained that phase 3 could build up to 12 units and that asking for a parking concession there would reduce required stalls from an expected 18 down to 12 — "so it's a difference of 6 parking stalls," she said. The applicant also said designs for phase 2 are already underway and that the project team expects to exceed the 140 units referenced in the omnibus agreement as site design is refined. Council and staff noted that phase-specific details (including parking and unit mix) will return for later review when subsequent phase DAs or final plats are brought forward.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source