Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Policy Updates topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Umatilla School District board approves multiple policy updates and routine financial items
Summary
At its Oct. 9 meeting the Umatilla School District board unanimously approved the consent agenda (minutes, disbursements and financial statements), Division 22 assurances and a package of district policy updates covering student records, graduation requirements and immunization rules.
Get email alerts on the Policy Updates topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Umatilla School District Board of Directors on Oct. 9 approved routine financial items and a set of policy revisions aimed at aligning district procedures with state requirements.
Board Member Jorge Meza moved to approve the consent agenda โ which included minutes from the September workshop and regular meeting, supervisory staff and board conflicts of interest disclosures, disbursements and the district financial statements โ and Board Member Jon Lorence seconded. The motion passed unanimously, 4-0, with three members absent.
The board also approved the Division 22 assurances, which outline the district's compliance expectations under state education program rules, and a package of policy updates. The approved policies included DBEA (Budget Committee, Version 2); IGBAB/JO-AR and JO/IGBAB-AR (education records and records of students with disabilities); IIA (instructional materials); IKF (graduation requirements); JHCA/JHCB (immunization and sports participation); JOA (directory information); and LBEA (denial of enrollment for virtual public charter school students).
Board Chair Lesly Claustro-Sanguino presided over the unanimous votes. The minutes record each motion as passing 4-0; the text lists the voting members as Josiah Barron, Jon Lorence, Jorge Meza and Board Chair Claustro-Sanguino. The minutes note three absent members but do not identify them by name in the motion records.
The minutes do not include further detail on substantive changes within the policies (such as specific language edits) or implementation timelines. Those details are recorded in the board packet rather than the meeting minutes provided.
