Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the School Safety topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

District safety plan presented, Board told of timeline for public comment and adoption

PENN YAN CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT · July 15, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

District staff presented a draft district-level safety plan rooted in the SAVE Act and commissioner's regulations, listed 10 high-level recommendations (including ParentSquare and a double-buzz entry), and said the draft was posted July 8 for a one-month public comment period before board consideration on Aug. 12.

Patrick Doobie, the district safety coordinator, opened the informational presentation by saying the district-level safety plan is intended "to prevent or minimize the effects on school violence and to provide a plan to respond should the need arise." He told the board the draft was posted July 8 to the district website and is available for public review during a one-month comment window; building-level plans are withheld from public posting because of sensitivity and confidentiality.

Doobie described a formal evaluation process the committee used'artifact and literature reviews, staff surveys, a superintendent panel, camera coverage mapping by Mr. Miller, and door and lock checks by Mr. Newby. He summarized 10 simplified recommendations including adopting a universal district communication platform (ParentSquare), reviewing off-campus evacuation locations and scheduling drills for all buildings, expanding security for larger non-school-day events, developing event-specific functional annexes (lockout/lockdown/evacuation), maximizing and upgrading cameras, instituting regular door-hardware checks, requiring staff badges, upgrading handheld and bus radios, examining visitor identification systems, implementing a double-buzz entry, and creating a long-term fiscal plan to support ongoing security work.

The presenter emphasized the plan is a multiyear effort and recommended bringing an outside safety firm to complete a comprehensive review of annexes and threat-specific plans because the committee members are "educational experts" rather than safety specialists. The board asked clarifying questions about which off-campus events would trigger heightened security and about the district's current inspection and reporting systems for doors and cameras; staff acknowledged existing inspections but said they are formalizing annual checks and reporting to ensure consistent maintenance and follow-up.