Get email alerts on the Ai Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Audience asked where responsibility for AI bias lies; presenters said both vendors and users have roles
Summary
In Q&A, attendees asked whether model trainers or prompt engineers bear responsibility; presenter Dave Gadeau called it "things you can control and things you can't," recommending local mitigation and broader policy engagement.
Get email alerts on the Ai Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
During the audience Q&A, a participant identified as Tom Petros asked: "Thoughts on where the responsibility lies in addressing bias in LLM training improvements or in human prompting refinements?" Gadeau replied that responsibility is shared: "to me, that's a conversation of, like, things you can control and things you can't," recommending that individual users practice responsible prompting and that vendors and policymakers address structural problems.
On lawsuits and liability, Gadeau said there are many ongoing legal cases against AI companies — primarily for hallucinations and safety incidents — and that hiring‑related litigation tied to screening tools has already occurred and sometimes settled. Deborah Ortloff added that users contributing to free models should be mindful of privacy and avoid submitting personally identifying information to public services.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
