Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procurement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves recommended auditing firm for FY26–28 audits; transcript shows inconsistent firm name references
Summary
After an audit procurement committee reviewed proposals using the state auditor's evaluation system, the board approved the committee's top-scoring firm for FY26–28 audits. The transcript contains inconsistent firm names in adjacent lines; the board approved the recommended firm as presented.
Get email alerts on the Procurement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Staff reported the audit procurement committee — consisting of the superintendent, the senior accountant and another committee member — independently scored audit proposals using the state auditor's required evaluation system and recommended the top-scoring firm for the district's FY26–28 audits. "Based on those combined scoring results, Farrion Associates received the highest overall score," staff said during the presentation, and the board moved and seconded the recommendation.
The board approved the recommendation by voice vote. Note: the meeting transcript contains inconsistent references to firm names in nearby lines (the audit item mentioned McCurry and Associates earlier in the agenda and a later line during the vote referenced a different name). The board's recorded action at this meeting was to approve the procurement committee's recommended auditing firm; staff or minutes should be consulted to confirm the exact legal contracting name for the procurement record.

