Get email alerts on the Oversight Tools topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Oversight law gives committee subpoenas, program evaluation and audit authority; testimony required under oath
Summary
The statute grants the committee tools including requests for information, subpoenas, program evaluation reports, audit referrals to the Legislative Audit Council, and requires testimony under oath; criminal contempt provisions also apply.
Get email alerts on the Oversight Tools topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Jennifer Dobson told the committee that Act 121 provides several tools for investigative oversight, including requests for information, depositions, subpoenas, and program evaluation reports. She said the chairman may request that the Legislative Audit Council review program evaluation reports or conduct audits of agencies.
"All testimony given to the investigating committee must be under oath," Dobson said, and she added that witnesses retain the same privileges they would have in a civil action and may have counsel present. Dobson also warned members that the statute includes criminal provisions, notably contempt to the General Assembly, for noncompliance with oversight processes.
Dobson noted a specific exception for agencies vested with revenue authority, which can submit program evaluation reports or opt to provide annual reports or external audits instead. The committee will have to decide how and when to use subpoenas or audit referrals as it moves into substantive reviews.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
