Get email alerts on the Zba Referral topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board denies Nob Hill Unit 4 deck plan and refers case to ZBA
Summary
The board denied a minor site-plan modification for a deck extension at Nob Hill Unit 4 because the addition did not meet the 25-foot separation requirement and referred the matter to the Zoning Board of Appeals for a variance.
Moshe Attie said the Nob Hill Unit 4 applicant seeks a minor site-plan modification to extend a deck that would not meet the 25-foot separation requirement for townhouse developments. The building department advised a variance is needed from the Zoning Board of Appeals because the townhouse/row-house code is not explicit on the issue.
The board noted the owner must secure homeowners’ association approval and permission to build in the common area before returning to the Planning Board. The application was determined Type 2 under SEQRA. Arthur Knapp moved to deny the site-plan modification and to refer the matter to the ZBA; Kristin Boyd seconded the motion, which the board approved.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
