Get email alerts on the Executive Session Performance Evaluation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee votes to enter private session to review confidential board evaluation
Summary
The governance committee voted to convene a private session under the Public Officers Law and Public Authorities Law to review the Authority's annual confidential board member performance evaluation and then recommended approval of the evaluation report after reconvening.
Chair Dale Bridal moved the committee to a resolution to meet in private session to review the annual confidential board member performance evaluation, citing statutory authority for confidentiality. "Section 108 of the public officer's law authorizes the members to convene in private session in order to review a matter made confidential by state law," Bridal said, and he noted that Section 2800 of the Public Authorities Law requires an annual confidential board member performance evaluation.
The committee voted in favor of the resolution and non-members were asked to leave the room while the webcast remained running. After the private session, the committee returned, reviewed the evaluation report and, with a motion and second, recommended that the full Board approve the Annual Confidential Board Member Performance Evaluation Report.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
