VDOT explains roadside management options for Nottoway County, including locality- and private-led projects

A VDOT land‑use engineer addressed the Nottoway County Board to explain two programs that permit enhanced landscaping and site amenities along limited‑access ramps and interchanges.

The presenter described the Comprehensive Roadside Management Project (CRMP), initiated by a locality or by board request, and the Roadside Special Management Project (RSMP), which is led by a private entity but must include a county resolution of support. "The comprehensive roadside management program...allows localities and private entities to enhance interstates or other interchanges with landscaping and other site amenities," the presenter said, describing landscaping, hardscaping and certain types of structures as eligible elements.

Officials were told that applications require a master plan, construction documents and a draft maintenance agreement; maintenance is the applicant's responsibility and must be guaranteed by surety or an ongoing maintenance agreement. The land‑use permit route was emphasized: these projects go through VDOT's land‑use process rather than the longer VDOT UPC project pipeline, so smaller landscaping efforts can be approved more quickly. The presenter said simple landscaping projects in low‑safety‑concern areas could be routed in about three months, while projects requiring a right‑of‑way move or structural work have taken as long as six months.

He cited local examples to illustrate the range of treatments: Exit 45 on I‑95 in Prince George County with ramp landscaping and ornamental spires; a Washington Street bridge treatment with decorative lampposts and bridge arches; an I‑95/Route‑54 interchange sign; the Downtown Expressway project; and an example on U.S. 29 near Lynchburg.

Board members asked whether CRMP and RSMP elements could be combined. The presenter said a private RSMP can include county support but it must be backed by a board resolution for approval. He also noted that because limited‑access corridors require multiple agency signoffs, staff and consultant responsiveness determine the delivery speed.

Board members were advised to begin with a concept sketch or "onion‑skin" plan rather than a full engineered set; staff can evaluate a concept and advise whether the proposed improvements are feasible under VDOT rules. The board asked for follow‑up guidance on next steps and permitting requirements so a locality‑led beautification effort can move from concept to formal submission.