Citizen Portal

Get email alerts on the Licensing Compacts topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Psychology and medical nominees express caution on interstate licensing compacts, cite training and cultural concerns

Senate Committee on Commerce and Consumer Protection · March 30, 2026

Summary

Nominees for psychology and medical boards told the Senate Commerce Committee they were wary of broad interstate licensing compacts, citing local training goals and cultural sensitivity; committee members pressed nominees about workforce shortages and temporary licensure measures.

Several nominees for psychology and medical boards described workforce challenges and gave cautious responses when asked about interstate licensing compacts.

Senator Awa told nominees that "we have a real shortage in psychologists" and asked where nominees would stand on compacting licensure to increase practitioner supply. Sean Scanlan said he might have to recuse in certain compact-related decisions because of his ties to a university that trains local students and emphasized that expanding local training programs was a priority. Sherry Tahi, a clinical psychologist nominated to a board, said she was concerned about "cultural sensitivity and awareness of our community" if Hawaii were to adopt broader compacts and said she would need additional time to consider such policies.

Dr. Bob Ing (medical board nominee) described limited local changes following an enacted "doctors' compact" and credited telemedicine with improving access to specialty care in some cases. He told the committee he had seen "not a lot of change" from the compact in day-to-day access on Kauai but said telemedicine remains an important tool. Committee members noted the legislature previously authorized temporary licensing measures intended to address backlog issues while broader compact proposals are considered.

Nominees generally emphasized the balance between expanding access to care and ensuring local cultural competence and quality; several said they would recuse from decisions where personal or institutional interests could create conflicts.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source