Citizen Portal

Get email alerts on the Committee Rules topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee rejects proposal to raise quorum, adopts rules 8–3

State Planning & Community Affairs · February 5, 2026

Summary

The State Planning & Community Affairs committee rejected an amendment to raise the quorum from five to nine and approved its committee rules by an 8–3 vote after debate about scheduling and representation.

The State Planning & Community Affairs committee voted to adopt its committee rules after rejecting an amendment that would have increased the quorum from five members to nine. The rules were approved by an 8–3 margin.

Representative Derek Jackson moved to amend rule number two to raise the quorum to nine, saying the change "would give us a 50% composition when you have a body of 18." Members debated whether a higher quorum better represented constituents or whether it would make it harder to begin meetings when attendance is split across overlapping committee schedules. After a voice/hand vote the amendment failed and the committee proceeded to vote on the rules.

A motion to "do pass" the committee rules was made and seconded; the rules passed 8–3. Vice Chair Stinson explained her vote in favor of the lower five-member quorum, saying as the session deepens "there's going to be many times that there's going to be two or three meetings going on at the same time," and that a lower quorum helps ensure business can begin.

The action sets the committee's operating rules for the session, including the quorum threshold of five members; members did not adopt the proposed nine-member quorum.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source