Get email alerts on the Board Actions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Crawford ISD trustees approve improvement plan, policy update and routine consent items
Summary
At its Nov. 17 meeting, the Crawford ISD Board of Trustees unanimously approved the 2025–26 District Improvement Plan, Policy Update #126 and several routine items including the October minutes and the monthly financial report; votes for two appraisal district board candidates also passed 6‑0.
The Crawford Independent School District Board of Trustees approved a slate of consent and business items at its Nov. 17 regular meeting in the high school library.
Trustees unanimously approved the minutes of the Oct. 20 regular meeting and the district's monthly financial report after a motion from Mr. Jesse Bolgiano and a second from Mrs. Christy Murphy. Board minutes record the motion as passing 6‑0.
The board also approved the 2025–26 District Improvement Plan following a motion by Mr. Jared Griffin and second by Mrs. Christy Murphy; the vote was 6‑0. Trustees approved Policy Update #126 on a 6‑0 vote after a motion by Mr. Griffin and a second from Mr. Bolgiano.
In separate votes on appraisal district representation, the board authorized the district's 30 votes for the McLennan Central Appraisal District board in favor of Jim Smith (motion by Mrs. Christy Murphy, second by Mr. Jared Griffin) and approved the district's four votes for the Coryell Central Appraisal District board in favor of Kevin George (motion by Mr. Jesse Bolgiano, second by Mr. Chad Talbert). Both motions passed 6‑0.
A separate agenda item to purchase district communication devices using Safe Cycle 2 Grant funds and the Security Allotment was tabled; the minutes do not record a mover/second or the rationale for tabling. The meeting later moved to closed session and adjourned at 8:30 p.m.
The board's meeting minutes list those present and the formal roll call; no dissenting votes were recorded on the approved items.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
