Get email alerts on the Meeting Procedure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning board votes to enter nonpublic session citing RSA 91-A exemptions
Summary
At the end of the meeting the board voted to enter a nonpublic session under RSA 91-A:3 (reputation, pending litigation, legal advice); a roll-call vote recorded several members voting yes.
Get email alerts on the Meeting Procedure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Toward the end of the meeting a board member moved to enter a nonpublic session under RSA 91-A:3, citing subparagraphs including reputation, pending litigation and consideration of legal advice. The motion was seconded and the board took a roll-call vote.
During the roll call the chair read votes in alphabetical order by first name; the record shows: "Allen votes yes. Brendan votes yes. Eric votes yes." The board then proceeded to the nonpublic session as announced.
This motion invokes state statute RSA 91-A:3 and was recorded by staff as the reason for the executive session; no further public business was conducted afterward on the public record.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
