Board flags table error on minimum lot width; staff to correct during TRC review
Summary
Board members questioned a table entry that appeared to set a 28‑foot minimum lot width with 5‑foot setbacks (which would leave an 18‑foot building footprint); staff said the entry is a scrivener's error and will correct it during TRC review.
A board member raised a concern about a data table entry that—if applied literally—would have made some lots only 28 feet wide and, with 5‑foot setbacks, would leave an impractically narrow building footprint.
Staff identified the item as a scrivener's error in the data table and committed to correcting it during the Technical Review Committee (TRC) process. Planning staff noted that existing developed lots in prior phases include a mix of forty‑ and fifty‑foot widths and that the proposed density and minimum lot area (about 4,000 square feet) are consistent with prior approvals.
The correction will be made before the amended master site plan is finalized and reflected in the developer agreement and TRC materials.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
