Tenafly council debates tree‑fund uses, staffing and transparency

Council considered draft tree‑management language and a companion resolution to dedicate and permit spending from the tree fund for canopy management, hazardous‑tree removal and certain equipment. Staff said the proposal would enable more proactive tree care and permit targeted mitigation ahead of storms; several council members cautioned against broadening the fund’s allowable uses without guardrails.

One councilmember warned about opening the fund to new expense categories and proposed creating a separate utility‑protection or canopy‑management account to keep mitigation funds distinct from resident escrow funds. During discussion a speaker noted budget limits: “Again, this is not to exceed 70,000,” reflecting a stated cap on an interim spending authorization for storm‑related pruning and mitigation.

Members debated whether the borough’s DPW staff can handle additional tree work or whether outside contractors would be necessary; some proposed hiring an additional licensed tree foreman rather than repeatedly outsourcing the work. Staff and the attorney stressed that any expenditures, contracts and bids remain subject to council approval at each step and that procurement rules would apply.

Council agreed to send revised draft language and a resolution back for further review, with staff asked to report on in‑house capacity, estimated costs and recommended accounting treatment for the proposed fund uses.