Residents urge pause on proposed Google data center, cite noise, water and transparency concerns

Dozens of residents told the Botetourt County Board of Supervisors on March 24 that they oppose the proposed Google data center (referred to in public comments as Project Raspberry), citing noise, water use, air quality, and transparency concerns.

“Data centers produce constant low‑frequency noise in the range of 55–85 decibels, with backup generators reaching 100–110 decibels during testing or outages,” said Nancy Hartman, summarizing long‑standing scientific concerns she said make children especially vulnerable. Multiple speakers said diesel backup generators run routinely for maintenance, increasing noise and air pollution risks near Greenfield Elementary School and area trails.

Residents also questioned the project’s likely demands on water and power. “I do not want residents to face higher water, power, or tax costs as a result of the development,” said Melissa Smith, who asked the Board to disclose how much has already been spent on negotiations and what infrastructure costs would fall to taxpayers.

Several commenters criticized the process and urged the Board to increase public access to information. Frank Lucia said he was troubled that negotiated agreements include provisions for expedited permitting and nondisclosure agreements, and he asked the Board to reconsider whether those terms unduly limit resident protections. Christine Liana and Jessie Bearman presented petitions asking the Board to hold a dedicated 6:00 p.m. public meeting, to be advertised at least a week in advance, so residents unable to attend daytime sessions can comment.

Some speakers requested technical and financial analyses before decisions proceed. Danny Goad asked for a cash‑flow analysis showing projected real estate, personal property, and utility tax revenues—along with payback assumptions and any costs the county might absorb. Terri Brockly urged Board members to conduct site visits and to confirm whether the company is required to build independent power facilities rather than rely on the existing grid.

Board members acknowledged the comments but did not take immediate action on the project at this meeting. Chair Dr. Donald M. Scothorn said staff will continue to provide updates; several residents asked specifically for earlier public access to consultants’ reports and for a town‑hall style meeting in the evening so more residents can attend.