Get email alerts on the Ethics topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee votes to refer multiple counts to State Ethics Commission, to prepare advisory reprimand for R.J. May
Summary
The committee ordered staff to prepare documentation to refer six-count and one-count complaints to the State Ethics Commission and moved to prepare an advisory public reprimand for former Representative R.J. May, with roll calls ordered and unanimous support reported.
Get email alerts on the Ethics topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The committee voted to refer multiple potential violations uncovered during the investigation to the State Ethics Commission and directed staff to prepare the formal documentation. Representative Guest moved to refer a committee complaint containing six counts and a second complaint containing one count of potential violations of the Ethics Act; the motion was seconded and roll call was ordered.
Separately, a member moved to publicly reprimand former Representative R.J. May via an advisory opinion under South Carolina Code section 8-13-540 and House Ethics Committee Rule 6, with staff preparing the appropriate paperwork for committee approval. Roll-call voting was ordered for these motions; the chair recorded unanimous 'Aye' responses for the actions the committee approved that day.
The motions formalize next steps: referral to the State Ethics Commission for formal review of the enumerated counts and internal work to draft an advisory opinion delivering a public reprimand. Staff and outside counsel said they will prepare the necessary documentation and a written investigative report for the committee's review.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
