Citizen Portal

Get email alerts on the Road Resurfacing topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Cecil Township approves $1.0 million-plus resurfacing program, awards three contracts

Cecil Township Board of Supervisors · March 3, 2026

Summary

The Board of Supervisors approved three contracts for the 2026 road resurfacing program—two to Youngblood Paving and one to CASMAC Line Striping—covering liquid-fuels and township-funded projects and a long list of local roads. The board discussed the possibility of adding Papp Road by change order.

The Cecil Township Board of Supervisors voted March 2 to award three contracts that together advance the township's 2026 road resurfacing and striping work.

Chair (speaker 3) presented Resolution 53-2026 to award Contract A to Youngblood Paving in the amount of $785,684.10, funded by liquid fuels. After a motion and second the board voted in favor and the motion carried.

Joe (speaker 6), the staff member who described the projects, said Contract B (Resolution 54-2026), a township-funded general fund project awarded to Youngblood Paving for $129,201.30, includes resurfacing the former public works parking lot, intersections at SR 980 and Majestic Drive, and about 600 feet of Baker Road from Georgetown. "That's our scope of work for that project," Joe said.

Resolution 55-2026 awarded Contract C, a line-striping contract to CASMAC Line Striping for $131,152.15. Staff read an extensive list of streets to be striped, including Musa Bishop Road, Town Center Boulevard, Milan Drive, Corporate Drive and sections of Southpointe Boulevard. Board members noted line-striping typically attracts fewer bidders and has seen rising prices; one member said prices increased about $6,000 on a previous job.

Board members discussed adding Papp Road to the striping work. Staff said the contract is a unit-price job and additions could be made by change order but would require a future public vote if the change increases the contract beyond what was advertised. "If we can't include it now, we'll have to figure out what the cost is and then take a public vote on it," a board member said. The board approved the three resolutions unanimously during the meeting.

The board did not set a completion date in the discussion recorded at the meeting; bidders and timeline details beyond the contracts and scope were not specified in the transcript.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source